Comparison
iRo Proxy | پروکسی vs Proxy MTProto
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @iroproxy | @proxymtproto |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 7.8M | 12M |
| Avg views | 900,225 | 508,458 |
| Engagement rate | 11.5% | 4.3% |
| 30-day growth | +11.7% | +3.5% |
| Language | فارسی | English |
| Category | — | tech |
| Channel age | 2538 days | 3021 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@iroproxy
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@proxymtproto
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.