Comparison
ABRILOFICIAL1 —————————————————————VERITOAGUATIKTOK Y ABRILRETOS y PRETTYRETOS vs DAZNp SERIE A CALCIOn PARTITEo
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
ABRILOFICIAL1 —————————————————————VERITOAGUATIKTOK Y ABRILRETOS y PRETTYRETOS@abriloficial1lDAZNp SERIE A CALCIOn PARTITEo@iptvita0
| Metric | @abriloficial1l | @iptvita0 |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 12,501 | 28,014 |
| Avg views | 5,178 | 11,930 |
| Engagement rate | 41.4% | 42.6% |
| 30-day growth | — | — |
| Language | Español | Español |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 228 days | 415 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@abriloficial1l
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@iptvita0
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.